To, Too, and Two How to Choose the Right Word

The words to, too, and two  are  homophones: they sound alike but have different meanings. The preposition  to refers to a place, direction, or position. The particle to is used before the verb in a to-infinitive. The adverb too means also, very, extremely, or additionally. Two refers to the number 2. Its probably the easiest one to remember, maybe because it doesnt look like it should rhyme with to and too. It can be confusing for English language learners, and even native English speakers, to distinguish and use these terms. How to Use To To is a preposition or part of a verb infinitive. For example, The boy went to the store to buy groceries. The first usage is a preposition. It starts a prepositional phrase explaining where the boy went. The second usage is as a particle — that is, to in this use is part of the verb to buy. How to Use Too Too means also or in addition. For example, Did you want to come with us too?That new shirt you bought is too cute for words! In the top sentence, the first to is a particle (as described above); it is part of the verb to come. The word too in the first example means also, additionally, or as well. In the second example, the word too is used as an adverb. It describes, or modifies, the verb cute and means very or extremely. How to Use Two The word two always refers to numerical 2. For example: He had only two cents to his name.There were only two hours to go until the train would arrive. In the first example, the word two describes the number of pennies this person had left. In the second, the word two refers to the number of hours until the train arrived. How to Remember the Differences The confusion between to and too is one of the most common homophone errors in written English, as many people get stuck deciding between them (even native English speakers struggle with it). One easy trick to remember: If you mean to say too as in additionally, very, or also, remember that that word too (also) has more Os than the word to. Think of the extra O as meaning a little extra or additional. To differentiate too from to, look at the sentence without it, and even read it aloud to better engage your ear. Does it still make sense as a sentence? Examine this example: Shes such a copycat, Sondra lamented, because when I went to the store to stand in line for the new phone, she did, too. You can omit the too, and the sentence still makes sense. That is not the case if you remove either of the uses of the word to. You wouldnt say, Because I went ____ the store... or Because I went to the store ____ stand... When you read either phrase aloud, your ear detects a dropped word—as indicated by the blank lines—even if your eye skips over it. The sentence needs the prepositional to, in the first use, in order to show where she went (to the store), and the particle to in order to create an infinitive verb, to stand. Additionally, you can tell whether you need to or too by substituting the word also also. In the above example, you could say: Because when I went to the store to stand in line for the new phone, she did, also. This sentence still makes sense when you can swap out also for too. It would not make sense, however, to replace either the prepositional use of to (to the store) or the particle use (to stand), with the word also, as in: Because when I went also the store also stand in line for the new phone, she did, too. Clearly, you need to word to in these uses, not too. Examples Differentiating between to, too, and two allows us to use the right terms in the right way and at the appropriate times, even in the same sentence. Consider the following examples to deepen your understanding of the distinction between the three terms:   You can squeeze all three terms into a sentence that make sense, as in, We determined that we two had celebrated a little too much, and so we decided to call a cab to come and take us to her parents house to recover. This example uses the word two indicating a number (we two), the word too as an adverb (too much), the word to as a particle — a part of an infinitive verb — several times (to call, to come, and to recover), and as a preposition (to her parents house).A sentence you would be more likely to encounter might state, The game was almost too exciting in the last two minutes of play. The word too in the sentence as used here is an adverb modifying the word exciting (too exciting), and two is used in its traditional role to indicate the number 2.Another sentence you might hear in everyday conversation might say, Please let us know if you two plan to go to the race because we want to tag along, too. The first of the three terms here, two refers to the number of peop le, the second and fourth are particles (to go and to tag), the third is a prepositional use (to the race), and the fifth is used as an adjective meaning also (tag along too). Idiom Alerts As these are such widely-used words, the three terms also appear in a number of idiomatic expressions in English. Here are a few: Too little, too late is an expression meaning that even though help (for example) arrived, it wasnt enough and it wasnt timely enough to make a difference in the effort to recover. After Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans and Mississippi, President George W. Bush was criticized about the delay of the response. It was seen as too little, too late.Two of a kind and two peas in a pod are expressions noting how two people (for example) are alike.Having two left feet refers to someone who isnt a good dancer or who is clumsy.If you say you have too many irons in the fire, are spread too thin,  or  have too much on your plate, it means that you have too many concurrent projects or demands on your time currently or at once. Likewise, if youre wearing too many hats, youre trying to take on too many roles at the same time or do too many jobs at once.If you are in too deep, you are overwhelmed, have more than you can handle, or you know more than you should about a situation and cant get out of it easily.If you want to have your cake and eat it, too, you want to do two things that are opposite. You want to both possess the cake and consume it.  To and fro means to move from one place to another or back and forth.If something is too rich for your blood, its too expensive for you or too much for you to handle.If there are too many cooks (or chefs) in the kitchen, there are too many people trying to control one project or have input into something. Similarly, too many cooks spoil the broth (or stew).Having too much of a good thing signals that youre overindulging in something or theres just too much of something, even though its not bad on its own. For example, a few holiday lights on the outside of a home can look lovely in their calm simplicity. Some people, however, cant seem to stop decorating and put up 100,000 strobing lights, which neighbors might joke can make the house visible from space. On a small house and lot, theyre likely exhibiting too much of a g ood thing. Sources Ticak, Marko. â€Å"To vs. Too.† Grammarly Inc., 2019.â€Å"To (prep.). Online Etymology Dictionary, Douglas Harper, 2019.â€Å"To vs. Too vs. Two. K12 Reader, 2018.

Similarities And Differences Between Lord Of The Flies...

Harry Hook did an amazing job producing the movie â€Å"Lord of the Flies†, though not a lot of people enjoyed it as much as William Golding’s book. The novel was published in 1954 and the movie was first released in 1990. The movie had many amazing details you didn’t want to miss and it was fascinating to watch as well. On the other hand, the book had much more action and meaning. For me, both the movie and the book were captivating. However, some parts were completely different. In this essay, I will be comparing and contrasting the movie and the novel â€Å"Lord of the Flies†. Firstly in the novel, it was clear that the children were all English schoolboys, but in the film, the boys appeared to be American because the director was an†¦show more content†¦It was Jack who noticed Piggys glasses and told him he could use them to start a fire. On the other hand, in the film, it was Ralph who had the idea to use his glasses, because Jack’s relationship was very weak with â€Å"the boy who had asthma.† And they surely didn’t get along. Secondly, there were a lot of differences about the pig (Lord of the Flies) and the snake-like thing. In the movie when the boys were all sitting around the fire and Jack started telling them a scary story about a â€Å"thing.† Although if you watch the movie you’d know that the â€Å"beastie† came from the imagination and noises the littluns had been hearing each night. In the book, the beast (dead man) also got spotted by the boys tangled in a tree with his parachute, and when Ralph noticed him he said â€Å"It had teeth†¦. And big black eyes.† If you compare that to the film it turns out to be the opposite since a littlun from Jack’s tribe heard someone in a cave while hunting and described it is a monster. Now, let’s talk about the Pig or in other words the â€Å"Lord of the flies† and how Simon approached him in a different way. In the movie, Simon didn’t actually talk to the â€Å"Pig on a Stick†. He was halluc inating and imagining that the pigs head was talking to him. But, in reality, it was actually his line†¦ Fancy thinking the beast was something you could huntShow MoreRelatedLord Of The Flies Film Analysis1084 Words   |  5 Pagesadapted into a film. Lord of the Flies most definitely has these qualities like a strong conflict, interesting plot, and many literature techniques. Peter Brook created a film adaptation of Lord of the Flies in 1963. Peter Brook, director of the Lord of the flies film, did a commendable job of making the movie as similar as possible to the novel by William Golding. There are still a few key differences that make the novel much more compelling to read than watching the film. The movie was lacking in showingRead MoreApa: Comparison Between the Hunger Games and Lord of the Flies1576 Words   |  7 Pagesand contrasting the similarities and difference of group and individual survival between the Hunger Games by Suzanne Collin, Lord of the Flies by Willi am Golding, and the 1990 film of Lord of the Flies directed by Harry Hook. BY: Becky Coutlee April, 23, 2012 D.Smith Comparing and contrasting the similarities and difference of group and individual survival between the Hunger Games by Suzanne Collin, Lord of the Flies by William Golding, and the 1990 film of Lord of the Flies directed by Harry HookRead MoreThe Bad Seed Vs Lord Of The Flies1451 Words   |  6 PagesThe Lord of the Flies and â€Å"The Bad Seed† have some similarities and some differences. First, the Lord of the Flies and â€Å"The Bad Seed† are the same because they both show theories on where evil comes from, either nature or nurture. Additionally, they both show that children are capable of evil. On the other hand, The Lord of the Flies and â€Å"The Bad Seed† have some differences. First, the Lord of the Flies focuses on the nurture theory, or the theory that evil is fueled by surroundings, but â€Å"The BadRead MoreCivilization in Lord of the Flies546 Words   |  2 Pagesappeared. To be called uncouth is a grave insult. However, is civilization truly a p art of who humans are or is what they have come to associate with savagery more true to the human heart? Through Peter Brook and William Golding’s presentation of Lord of the Flies share the idea that â€Å"savagery† will overcome rational thought and when structure falls, the primitive mind will rule, Brook shows this primitiveness as more a part of the human psyche than an evil to be eliminated. Savagery overcomes formsRead MoreLord Of The Flies, By William Golding And The Perks Of Being A Wallflower1087 Words   |  5 PagesFor me, coming of age novels always grab my attention contrary to other genres. Novels such as Lord of the Flies by William Golding and The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky are among some of my most beloved. In my junior year, I read A Separate Peace by John Knowles for my AP U.S. History class while I read The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger over the summer. A Separate Peace explores the rivalry that can lie at the heart of many friendships and conveys the concept of individualityRead MoreComparing and Contrasting Alexander Mcqueen and Christian Dior1539 Words   |  7 PagesAlexander McQueen, however is someone I have lived to see develop and become one of the greatest designers of all time. Although these two designers differ in their style and aesthetic, there is always more than meets the eye and there are many similarities be tween these two visionaries. Christian Dior was born in 1905 in Granville, which is a small town off the coast of Normandy. Ever since he was a little boy all Christian wanted to do was work in some aspect of the arts. He was the second born ofRead MoreMean Girls vs Lord of the Flies3842 Words   |  16 Pageseveryday between both men and women. The film Mean Girls, directed by Mark Walters, follows a young girl, Cady’s, transition from being home schooled to public high school. Cady enters the school’s group of mean girls, otherwise known as â€Å"the plastics†, which consists of Regina George, Gretchen Wieners, and Karen Smith. Throughout the film each character struggles with their true identity. There are also many power struggles, and violent actions toward each other. The novel Lord of the Flies, writtenRead MoreMedia Representation Of Art Crime3638 Words   |  15 Pagesinto view. The film debuted in 2014 to mixed reviews, but did a decent job of highlighting the importance of savi ng art and cultural heritage. Disturbingly, however, and not accurate in the historical sense, there did not exist the sexual tension between the only female character and the officer. This is not an instance of the ‘Hollywood Art Thief’, but the boy-meets-girl scenario somehow eked its way back into the script, cheapening the truth somehow. What is true, and alarming is that are the artRead More Rude Boy Music In Comparison With Gangster Rap Essay4815 Words   |  20 Pagesthey erupted in cheers. At first Selassie did not want to leave the plane. (Potash, 16) â€Å" If I dream, mon, every Rasta man’s dream, to fly home to Ethiopia and leave a-Babylon, where de politicians doan let I an’ I brethren be free and we own righteous way.†  ­ Bob Marley (Bradley, 16) This quote from Bob Marley shows the goal of most Rastafarian to fly back to Africa and live in Ethiopia. Rastafarians see Ethiopia as their homeland, and to fulfill a Rasta’s dream would to be leaving BabylonRead More C.S. Lewis on Misunderstanding Fantasy Essay4960 Words   |  20 Pagesgeneric labels, applied wholesale to fantastic literature, had pushed it off the radar until readers of Fantasy had become literary lepers, lurking in the corners of accepted literary societies. Recent big screen blockbusters such as The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring and its sequel, The Two Towers, as well as the two Harry Potter films have restored much attention to the oft-ignored genre. Despite the commercial success of the two fantastical franchises, however, Fantasy

Democracy Best Form of Government Free Essays

Democracy is best defined as the government of the people, by the people. The classical example of democracy is that of ancient Athens, where the whole populace would meet in the marketplace to vote on decisions. It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government, except all the others have been tried. We will write a custom essay sample on Democracy Best Form of Government? or any similar topic only for you Order Now In my opinion, democracy is not a perfect system, but it is the best form of government when compared to others and is the most effective among all different types of government. In a democratic government, power is given to the people. This allows the people to have a direct say in who governs them, via the votes cast by every adult member of the population. As such it ensures that a government is made up of those who are truly representative of the people, satisfying the population of electing a government that will think about them, care about them and provide for them. Furthermore, when power is given to the people, the people will be more careful when using their power as they will have to bear the consequences if the leader elected is corrupted or not a wise leader. By giving power to the people allows decisions to be made according to the will of the people and also prevents the abuse of power. Citizens are kept informed by the media and are thus fully capable of making an informed decision. Furthermore, the will of the people is far more representative of different groups in society than the condescending rule by elites, who have no understanding of different ways of life. Only the citizens of a country understand what kind of leader they truly needs and in a democratic country they will have the ability to vote for them. Democracy empowers the people and allows them to participate in decision-making, which is why it is the best form of government. Besides power, democracy also allows the freedom of speech and that allows a nation to improve and progress. Democratic nations allow citizens to criticize leaders, their policies and laws. Being open to criticism allows leaders to listen to opinions of the citizens and understand what the citizens truly needs. This allows policies to be improved and the nation to progress better. By silencing the people and censoring any constructive criticisms, citizens will gradually stop thinking critically and start to follow laws blindly. This will be detrimental to the innovation and creation of ideas in a nation. Allowing criticisms can ensure that citizens think critically of how policies and laws will affect them, constantly sharpening their thoughts. Having a population that thinks critically is vital to the progress of a nation, and a democratic government that allows the freedom of speech can allow the nation to improve and progress, thus being the best form of government. As mentioned earlier, democracy is a not perfect form of government. Citizens of a country have never received any training and do not possess any skills needed to face and solve the problems that a state faces. Also, the masses are easily manipulated and tend to act according to their feelings. For example, after the 911 terror attacks in New York, many citizens of America pushed for the use of nuclear technology against Middle East. If America were a full democratic country, it would have already been engulfed into another nuclear war, and the consequences are heavy. As such, expecting the people to elect the â€Å"best tools for the job† is unrealistic. Government from above can see, by virtue of its position and advantages, what is a better solution for problems. Therefore, democracy may not be as effective in certain situations as other forms of government. Furthermore, real, effective leadership must come from above and not from below. The government should give orders, make laws and not take orders from the people. Democracy functions on the unrealistic assumption that all citizens are as capable as the leaders and is able to make the best decision. This is what makes democracy imperfect and ineffective. In conclusion, democracy is, to a large extent, the best form of government. The best form of government is that which teaches us to govern ourselves. However, if man were angels, no government would be necessary. Hence, a balance should be striked between governing the people and allowing them to make decisions themselves, and democracy is the only form of government where such a balance can be found. How to cite Democracy Best Form of Government?, Papers

One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest2 Essay Example For Students

One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest2 Essay For this quarters book report I choose to read a book that was not on the lists given to me. I picked One Flew Over the Cuckoos nest because I thought that it would be an interesting book with lots of relative themes to what I have gone through, and what I will go through. Not literally as much figuratively. As I first started to read the book I thought it would be just another story about lunatics in a Mental Institution with no help for cure. As I read the book I found that it actually kept my attention and was intriguing. I found out the full meaning of the phrase dont judge a book by its cover. As I read the story I was interested in Keseys motives behind writing such a book so I did a little research. I found out that the inspiration for One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest actually came from work that he did in a Sanitarium talking to the patients and the staff. Also through out the book he used symbols of the 1960s thoroughly through out. Symbols of rebellion and of individuality. These are most evident in the on going arguments of Nurse Ratched and Randal McMurphy. The entire book is narrated by a half indian patient of ten years, that pretends to be deaf and mute so as not to draw attention to himself. He, along with many others, is considered to be a chronic, a patient who has no hope for healing, while some others are considered to be acutes, patients who have hope for recovery. The heavy relation to the sixties in this book is evident to me in that every character represents a certain aspect of the sixties population. The hippies, oppressors, and the people who stood out from the crowd to make a difference. The hippies are best show through the characters of the patients that are considered chronic. I think this because, correct me if Im wrong, but people may have seen the hippies as people who were too high to do anything and there was no hope at all for any of them in the future. Characters such as the lifeguard, Martini, Colonel Matterson (who keeps talking about past war experiences day and night), Ruckly, Sandy Gilfilliam, and Candy Star (both prostitutes). The Oppressors are best represented by Warren, Washington, Williams, and Geever; who were all hired because of their cruelty. Nurse Ratched is probably the most powerful example of this category. She is a former Army Nurse who believes that supreme power is the only power and therefore she rules her ward with an iron fist. Lastly the people who try to make a difference are best shown through the character of Randal McMurphy. He was transferred to the Mental Institution because he pretended to be crazy at a work farm cause he thought it would be easier at the sanitarium. He is the ideal con man who can get anyone to follow him. He first starts out by encouraging the gambling for more than matches, which is against Ratcheds rules, and finally ends up encouraging rebellion, at its highest level, against the Ward staff. Over all this book was a really good book. The book as a whole is a very bizarre book and it took me some time to get through it due to re-reading to make sure I caught it all the first time around. Even though it isnt for everybody I would recommend people to read it. Bibliography: